The Impact of Evolutionary Theory on our Conception of Reality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36790/epistemus.v17i35.298Keywords:
Evolution, natural selection, change, common ancestor, primatesAbstract
This essay exposes, in three central axes, the impact that evolutionary theory has had on humanity's conception of nature, biodiversity and itself. Firstly, it considers how scientific advances have helped us to conceive the dynamics of biological processes in nature. Then, the phylogenetic relationship that humans have with the rest of the biological species that exist and have existed on the planet, and the evolutionary lineages that binds us together with a common ancestor. Finally, ethological, morphological, physiological, biochemical and genetic studies support the similarities that we share with mammals and especially with other primates. Only 1% of the genetic characteristics differentiate us from species such as chimpanzees and bonobos, it is these differences that have allowed Homo sapiens to perform great achievements such as reaching the moon or sending memes through technological applications.
Downloads
References
. J. O. A. Onyeka, “The relevance of biological sciences in the 21st century”, Bio-Res., vol. 1, núm. 1, 2004. https://doi.org/10.4314/br.v1i1.28513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/br.v1i1.28513
. E. Watts y U. Kutschera, “On the historical roots of creationism and intelligent design: German Allmacht and Darwinian evolution in context”, Theory Biosci., vol. 140, núm. 2, pp. 157–168, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-021-00341-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-021-00341-x
. A. Laats, “An eternal monkey trial? Evolution and creationism in U.S. schools”, Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 102, núm. 5, pp. 24–28, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721721992561 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721721992561
. F. Pelayo, «El impacto del darwinismo en la sociedad española del siglo XIX», Hispania Nova, pp. 310-329, ene. 2016.
. T. Dobzhansky, “Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution”, Am. Biol. Teach., vol. 35, núm. 3, pp. 125–129, 1973. https://doi.org/10.2307/4444260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4444260
. L. Al-Shawaf, D. M. G. Lewis, N. Barbaro, y Y. S. Wehbe, “The products of evolution: Conceptual distinctions, evidentiary criteria, and empirical examples”, en The SAGE Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road London EC1Y 1SP: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2021, pp. 70–95. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529739442.n5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529739442.n5
. C. Rahbek et al., “Building mountain biodiversity: Geological and evolutionary processes”, Science, vol. 365, núm. 6458, pp. 1114–1119, 2019. DOI: 10.1126/science.aax0151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0151
. F. J. Cuen Romero, E. Chacón-Baca, J. Moreno-Bedmar, y M. P. Velasco-de León, “FÓSILES: HISTORIA DE LA VIDA EN LA TIERRA”, Epistemus, vol. 14, núm. 28, 2021. DOI: 10.36790/epistemus.v14i28.124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36790/epistemus.v14i28.124
. S. L. Brusatte et al., “The extinction of the dinosaurs: Dinosaur extinction”, Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc., vol. 90, núm. 2, pp. 628–642, 2015. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12128
. G. Ceballos, P. R. Ehrlich, y P. H. Raven, “Vertebrates on the brink as indicators of biological annihilation and the sixth mass extinction”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., vol. 117, núm. 24, pp. 13596–13602, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.192268611 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922686117
. D. M. Raup, “The role of extinction in evolution”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., vol. 91, núm. 15, pp. 6758–6763, 1994. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.6758 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.15.6758
. P. Raia et al., “Past extinctions of homo species coincided with increased vulnerability to climatic change”, One Earth, vol. 3, núm. 4, pp. 480–490, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.09.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.09.007
. S. Akanuma, “The common ancestor of all modern life”, en Astrobiology, Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019, pp. 91–103. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-3639-3_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3639-3_7
. A. R. McCune y J. C. Schimenti, “Using genetic networks and homology to understand the evolution of phenotypic traits”, Curr. Genomics, vol. 13, núm. 1, pp. 74–84, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/138920212799034785 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/138920212799034785
. A. J. Doig, “Frozen, but no accident - why the 20 standard amino acids were selected”, FEBS J., vol. 284, núm. 9, pp. 1296–1305, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.13982 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.13982
. E. V. Koonin y A. S. Novozhilov, “Origin and evolution of the genetic code: the universal enigma”, IUBMB Life, vol. 61, núm. 2, pp. 99–111, 2009. doi: 10.1002/iub.146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.146
. M. C. Weiss, M. Preiner, J. C. Xavier, V. Zimorski, y W. F. Martin, “The last universal common ancestor between ancient Earth chemistry and the onset of genetics”, PLoS Genet., vol. 14, núm. 8, p. e1007518, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007518 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007518
. A. Thanukos, “Bringing homologies into focus”, Evolution (N. Y.), vol. 1, núm. 4, pp. 498–504, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0080-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0080-5
. K. Prüfer et al., “The bonobo genome compared with the chimpanzee and human genomes”, Nature, vol. 486, núm. 7404, pp. 527–531, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11128
. A. Sánchez-Amaro y F. Rossano, “Chimpanzees and bonobos use social leverage in an ultimatum game”, Proc. Biol. Sci., vol. 288, núm. 1962, p. 20211937, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.1937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.1937
. J. M. Engelmann et al., “Chimpanzees consider alternative possibilities”, Curr. Biol., vol. 31, núm. 20, pp. R1377–R1378, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.09.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.09.012
. J. B. Harrod, “The chimpanzee stone accumulation ritual and the evolution of moral behavior”, en Synthese Library, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68802-8_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68802-8_4
. N. Kawai y T. Matsuzawa, “Numerical memory span in a chimpanzee: Cognition”, Nature, vol. 403, núm. 6765, pp. 39–40, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1038/47405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/47405
. Q. Ji, W. Wu, Y. Ji, Q. Li, y X. Ni, “Late Middle Pleistocene Harbin cranium represents a new Homo species”, Innovation (N Y), vol. 2, núm. 3, p. 100132, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100132
. I. Hershkovitz et al., “A Middle Pleistocene Homo from nesher Ramla, Israel”, Science, vol. 372, núm. 6549, pp. 1424–1428, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abh3169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abh3169
. F. Chen et al., “A late Middle Pleistocene Denisovan mandible from the Tibetan Plateau”, Nature, vol. 569, núm. 7756, pp. 409–412, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1139-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1139-x
. C. Liu, “A cathedral with disconnected chapels? Reassessing the cognitive capacities of Neanderthals in light of recent archaeological discoveries”, J. Cogn. Cult., vol. 21, núm. 3–4, pp. 243–260, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340107
. I. Tattersall, “History and reality of the genus ‘Homo’: What is it and why do we think so?”, Mètode Rev. difus. investig., vol. 0, núm. 8, 2017. https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.8.911 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.8.9111
. H. M. Dunsworth, “Origin of the genus homo”, Evolution (N. Y.), vol. 3, núm. 3, pp. 353–366, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0247-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0247-8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 EPISTEMUS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The magazine acquires the patrimonial rights of the articles only for diffusion without any purpose of profit, without diminishing the own rights of authorship.
The authors are the legitimate owners of the intellectual property rights of their respective articles, and in such quality, by sending their texts they express their desire to collaborate with the Epistemus Magazine, published biannually by the University of Sonora.
Therefore, freely, voluntarily and free of charge, once accepted the article for publication, they give their rights to the University of Sonora for the University of Sonora to edit, publish, distribute and make available through intranets, Internet or CD said work, without any limitation of form or time, as long as it is non-profit and with the express obligation to respect and mention the credit that corresponds to the authors in any use that is made of it.
It is understood that this authorization is not an assignment or transmission of any of your economic rights in favor of the said institution. The University of Sonora guarantees the right to reproduce the contribution by any means in which you are the author, subject to the credit being granted corresponding to the original publication of the contribution in Epistemus.
Unless otherwise indicated, all the contents of the electronic edition are distributed under a license for use and Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International — (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) You can consult here the informative version and the legal text of the license. This circumstance must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
The names and email addresses entered in this journal will be used exclusively for the purposes established in it and will not be provided to third parties or for their use for other purposes.
